Did MDPI remove impact factor?

Yes, some MDPI journals, notably the large International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH), had their impact factors removed by Clarivate (Web of Science) in early 2023 due to integrity concerns, causing major volume drops, though MDPI claims many others still have factors and received new ones later. While the flagship journal lost its coveted Impact Factor, leading to a significant decrease in submissions, MDPI maintains many journals retain their metrics and actively promotes their performance in new metrics releases.

Does MDPI have impact factor?

60 MDPI Journals Receive Their First Journal Impact Factor

When ESCI launched in 2016, 24 MDPI journals were included. By 2024, that number had grown to over 200—an indication of both our expanding journal portfolio and the increasing recognition of open access titles in major citation tracking systems.

Is the impact factor removed from Ijerph?

According to the Journal Citation Reports the journal had a 2021 impact factor of 4.614, but in February 2023, Clarivate delisted the journal in its main citation indexes (Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index), citing "publications that were deemed outside the scope of the journal".

Is MDPI removed from Web of Science?

2023 Clarivate delistings

In February 2023, Clarivate discontinued coverage of two MDPI journals, the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and the Journal of Risk and Financial Management in the Web of Science, for publishing content not related to their scope.

Is 2.5 a good impact factor for a journal?

Yes, a 2.5 impact factor (IF) is generally considered good or decent, falling into the respectable range for many fields, though it's not "top-tier" like journals with IFs of 10+; it signifies that articles in that journal are cited reasonably often, but its actual quality depends heavily on the specific research discipline, as averages vary significantly.
 

MDPI journal group predatory or not?

Is an impact factor of 9.9 good?

In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1.

Can impact factor be manipulated?

However, impact factors may be manipulated by editors. According to the ex- planatory statements and announcements made by the authors submitting their work to the journals, the impact factor is still being di- rectly manipulated [4–6].

Why do people still publish in MDPI?

The one upside to MDPI is that people who publish in it are typically early-career and desperate for collaborators to help build up their own research profile.

Is MDPI a respectable journal?

MDPI journals have a mixed and evolving reputation: they are known for fast, open-access publishing and high visibility but have faced past criticism for potentially weak peer review, rapid growth, and predatory accusations (though no longer officially listed as predatory). While some journals are respected (e.g., Batteries), the overall perception varies, with some academics viewing them as lower-tier or "mediocre," while MDPI emphasizes its COPE membership, DOAJ recognition, and efforts to improve standards.
 

What are the disadvantages of MDPI?

The downside is the questionable reputation which prevents many from submitting to MDPI journals at all. This can go to the extent that some would label the entire career of a researcher void if published even a single article in an MDPI journal; see Figure 4.

Is 4.8 a good Impact Factor?

Yes, a 4.8 impact factor is generally considered very good, often placing a journal in the top quartile (Q1) for its field, though its quality depends on the specific academic discipline, as impact factors vary significantly between fields like medicine vs. humanities. It signifies high citation rates, suggesting influence and quality, but should be viewed relative to other journals in the same subject category, not in isolation. 

Is sustainability MDPI predatory?

Sustainability is a peer-reviewed open-access academic journal published by MDPI. It covers all aspects of sustainability studies. In September 2021 the journal was among the initial 13 journals included in the official Norwegian list of possibly predatory journals, known as level X.

Is MDPI better than Elsevier?

Elsevier generally carries broader institutional prestige and long-standing credibility. MDPI offers faster, open-access visibility. Choose Elsevier for reputation and depth of peer review; choose MDPI for rapid, widely accessible publication. 2Are MDPI journals indexed in Scopus?

Is MDPI based in China?

Based in Basel, Switzerland, MDPI has the mission to foster open scientific exchange in all forms, across all disciplines.

Is MDPI Applied Sciences Q1 or Q2?

Applied Sciences received its CiteScore (2022) of 4.5, ranked 73/302 (Q1) in “Engineering, General Engineering”, 42/136 in “Physics and Astronomy, Instrumentation”, 32/92 (Q2) in “Chemical Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes”, 287/792 (Q2) in “Computer Science, Computer Science Applications”, 199/453 (Q2) in ...

Which are the predatory journals?

Predatory journals—also called fraudulent, deceptive, or pseudo-journals—are publications that claim to be legitimate scholarly journals, but misrepresent their publishing practices.

Who owns MDPI?

The publishing house that owns it, MDPI, was founded in Switzerland by the Chinese chemist Shu-Kun Lin and has multiplied its income, thanks to a transfer of millions of euros of public money budgeted for science.

Does MDPI pay reviewers?

We are committed to recognizing the efforts of all our reviewers. Reviewing for MDPI journals includes the following benefits: For every manuscript reviewed, the reviewer may receive a discount voucher code entitling them to a reduction in the article processing charge (APC) of a future submission to any MDPI journal.

What are the red flags of predatory publishing?

It may have typos or grammatical errors, feature distorted or watermarked images, lack an about page or contact information, or fail to list any affiliated organizations or publishers. The journal's editorial board is nonsensical or nonexistent.

What is a five-year impact factor?

5-year Impact Factor

The 5-year journal Impact Factor is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year. It is caclulated by dividing the number of citations in the JCR year by the total number of articles published in the five previous years.

Who is the CEO of MDPI?

Stefan Tochev (Chief Executive Officer)

Since stepping into a leadership role at MDPI, Stefan has led the expansion of the corporate marketing and communications department and played a key role in strengthening the company's global brand presence.

Is an impact factor of 4.8 good?

Yes, a 4.8 impact factor is generally considered very good, often placing a journal in the top quartile (Q1) for its field, though its quality depends on the specific academic discipline, as impact factors vary significantly between fields like medicine vs. humanities. It signifies high citation rates, suggesting influence and quality, but should be viewed relative to other journals in the same subject category, not in isolation. 

How to determine if a journal is predatory?

What is a Predatory Journal?

1. Have no rigorous peer review, editorial, or preservation services.
2. Have no quality control in their selection process.
3. Exploit open access publication models for the sole purpose of financial gain.

Is an impact score of 30 good?

Impact scores run from 10 to 90, where 10 is best. Generally speaking, impact/priority scores of 10 to 30 are most likely to be funded; scores between 31 and 45 might be funded; scores greater than 46 are rarely funded.