Is Frontiers a reliable source?

Frontiers is a large, open-access publisher with mixed reviews: it's accredited by major ethics bodies (COPE, OASPA) and indexed in Scopus/ESCI, suggesting legitimacy, but faces criticism for rapid review times and being listed as "not academic" in the Norwegian Scientific Index, leading to debates about its peer-review quality and predatory tendencies, making it a source that requires careful evaluation of individual articles and journals.

Is Frontiers a predatory publisher?

All Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall.

Is Frontiers in Psychology a reputable source?

The journal has a 2022 impact factor of 3.8. Since 2016, the journal has a score of 2 in the Norwegian Scientific Index, which "covers the most prestigious and rigorous channels".

Is Frontiers a good paper?

TLDR: Frontiers have shoddy review standards and should be avoided. That's not to say there aren't good papers in there, but they're not properly scrutinised.

What are the ethical concerns about Frontiers?

Frontiers Research Integrity Auditing team has uncovered a network of authors and editors who conducted peer review with undisclosed conflicts of interest and who have engaged in citation manipulation.

Technology for acquiring reliable source data from a chaotic world

Is frontier research legit?

Frontiers is accredited by and is a member of major publishing regulatory and ethical organizations, adhering to the highest quality standards and best ethical practices. These include COPE, OASPA - Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, and DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals.

Is Frontiers a scholarly article?

As of 2023, Frontiers Media receives an institutional-level rating of "level 0" in the Norwegian Scientific Index, a rating it kept since 2018, indicating that the publisher is "not academic", however individual Frontiers journals have separate journal-level ratings.

Does Frontiers peer review?

Our editorial review operations team ensures a high quality, rigorous, and efficient peer-review process for all manuscripts submitted to Frontiers. The team establishes and upholds the peer-review guidelines for editors, reviewers, and authors, which incorporate the best practices and editorial policies.

How to check if a journal is predatory?

Characteristics of Predatory Journals

1. E-mailed invitations to submit an article. ...
2. Journal's name is suspiciously similar to a prominent journal in the field.
3. Misleading geographic information in the title. ...
4. Website appearance. ...
5. Broad aim and scope. ...
6. Insufficient contact information. ...
7. Lack of editors or an editorial board.

Is 4.8 a good impact factor?

Yes, a 4.8 impact factor is generally considered very good, often placing a journal in the top quartile (Q1) for its field, though its quality depends on the specific academic discipline, as impact factors vary significantly between fields like medicine vs. humanities. It signifies high citation rates, suggesting influence and quality, but should be viewed relative to other journals in the same subject category, not in isolation. 

What is the rejection rate for Frontiers?

Submissions, acceptances, and rejections

Our peer review is designed to be thorough and efficient, so you receive a fair decision on your manuscript as soon as possible. In 2022 the rejection rate for articles was on average 40% across all Frontiers journals, and as high as 79% in some journals.

What is the most reliable psychology website?

For over 55 years, APA PsycInfo has been the most trusted index of psychological science in the world. With more than 5,000,000 interdisciplinary bibliographic records, our database delivers targeted discovery of credible and comprehensive research across the full spectrum of behavioral and social sciences.

Is 2.5 a good impact factor for a journal?

Yes, a 2.5 impact factor (IF) is generally considered good or decent, falling into the respectable range for many fields, though it's not "top-tier" like journals with IFs of 10+; it signifies that articles in that journal are cited reasonably often, but its actual quality depends heavily on the specific research discipline, as averages vary significantly.
 

Are MDPI and Frontiers predatory?

Because there are so many opinions on this matter, I am sharing the reasons why PredatoryJournals.org and Beall classified MDPI as a quasi-predatory publisher, while Frontiers is considered fully predatory.

Is Frontiers a sci journal?

Frontiers in Science is Frontiers' multidisciplinary, flagship, open access journal focused on scientific advances accelerating solutions to global challenges in human and planetary health.

Why are Frontiers important?

But the most important effect of the frontier has been in the promotion of democracy here and in Europe. As has been indicated, the frontier is productive of individualism. Complex society is precipitated by the wilderness into a kind of primitive organization based on the family.

What is a red flag indicating a journal might be predatory?

It may have typos or grammatical errors, feature distorted or watermarked images, lack an about page or contact information, or fail to list any affiliated organizations or publishers. The journal's editorial board is nonsensical or nonexistent.

Are there lists of predatory journals?

The DOAJ is a list of quality open-access publishers. It conducts quality checks and regularly purges the list of suspected predatory journals.

What happens if I publish in a predatory journal?

The lack of a review process results in the invalidity of papers published in predatory journals. In addition, these publishers do not have archiving policies that guarantee the preservation of published works, precisely because their only interest is profit.

Why are Frontiers considered predatory?

The manifesto also says that Frontiers staff interfere with editorial decisions, for instance by moving manuscripts from one editor to another to accelerate review, inviting authors to write a commentary without the knowledge of editors, and sometimes "deliberately overriding" editorial decisions.

How prestigious is Frontiers?

We're the 3rd most-cited publisher

Analysis of the world's 20 largest publishers by volume, ranked by average number of citations in 2022 received by articles published in 2019, 2020 and 2021 (Dimensions, 2023). Frontiers ranked 3rd most-cited with an average of 5 citations per article.

Is Frontier a high impact journal?

Yes, many Frontiers journals are considered high-impact, ranking well in their specific fields for citation metrics like Impact Factor and CiteScore, with some ranking in the top percentiles (e.g., top 10-25%) and leading their categories in citations, though perceptions vary, with some questioning their rigorousness despite high visibility and funding agency approvals. 

Are Frontiers reliable?

The Frontier has a strong reputation for reliability and ranks above average for midsize trucks. Owners report that many models last well beyond 200,000 miles with proper maintenance. Q: Which model years are the most dependable?

Is 3.8 a good impact factor?

You can find a journal's impact factor by referring to the Journal Citations Report (JCR) or Scopus. 🍋 What is an average 'good' impact factor? In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1.

Is Frontiers indexed in PubMed?

Led by Field Chief Editor Prof Michel Goldman (Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium), Frontiers in Medicine is indexed in PubMed Central (PMC), Web of Science (SCIE), and Scopus, among others, and welcomes basic and clinical medical research that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or ...